You are not alone
Facing the fear of filing bankruptcy is unimaginable to most. How and why someone finds themselves in this position are the often asked questions. For some it’s of their maintain doing, while others are forced into it but for many different reasons.
For a couple of years (as my business was having significant issues with volume), it seemed as though I was stranded alone on an island facing an ever so slow rising tide. There was nowhere to run or camouflage. My options were to either stay there and eventually drown, or, I could swim against the tide facing exposure…… but at least I would be swimming towards a distant light.
With me, it was always risk versus reward. That was a philosophical staple of being in business. But now those words represented something entirely different.
In this case, not taking a risk meant staying on the island and sight the water rise. But taking the risk meant dealing with the albatross (although was my livelihood) that was hanging around my neck.
The crushing and continual blows that my business was taking on had left me in dire straights. I decided to take the risk of cleansing myself of all business attachments which would include filing bankruptcy.
The current national economic troubles today leaves minute doubt that many others are, or soon will share my predicament. It’s not the raze of the world, but it may not be easy either.
What they must realize is that they are not alone and that their circumstances have been repeated over and over again.
The purpose of this text is to define the how and why I chose this path.
Pressure
With a debt service that was spiraling out of control, the pressure of filing for bankruptcy as an option was mounting. I felt like I was being choked in a tiny gloomy room with no way out. Trying to claw out of that room and that residence was wearing me down physically and mentally.
Every joyous or entertaining moment I had during this time was chilled by the reality that I was in a situation that I could no longer fix. Facing the fear of filing for bankruptcy was going to be my last obstacle, or so I thought. Except that I would have to find a diagram to deal with the humiliation that would certainly follow.
Bankruptcy would have to be an action of a last resort.
I’ve always been a winner in things that I do and never gave up or succumbed to a challenge. I am a grinder…… always willing to stick with things and persevere through whatever road blocks appear.
Knock me down a hundred times and I’ll get up every time.
But this time things were different.
I would watch my neighbor walk his dog in the early evenings and wonder “what is that like? ” Imagine, I concept, how nice it must be to be able to just go out for a walk with a dog, chat with anyone else that may be out tending to their yard, then go fix dinner without worrying about how I am going to sustain my business afloat for another week.
Certainly my neighbor was living in what seemed like a dreamworld to me.
Unless one has been there, the enveloping pressure of carrying an insurmountable debt load is merciless. At the end, I felt as though I was a punch drunk boxer that had fought one too many fights. But I realized that soon I was going to have to discontinue down on the canvas, as getting up again and again to continue this fight was going to do significant and probably permanent damage.
But if I lost this challenge of saving the business, then what?
First, the embarrassment of facing associates and family was going to be a difficult task. Me, bankrupt? No way? The apprehension of telling those involved would be as challenging as the bankruptcy itself I thought.
I was a winner. I can’t lose…… I don’t lose……. never………I am a grinder!
Next was recognizing that the consequences of filing for bankruptcy were vital. But I also realized that acting on this also provided a solution to a major problem.
Facing reality
I owned a business that had been in operation for 15 years, the first ten of which were mostly debt free. Personally, I had car payments and a mortgage, while all other debts accumulated were business related. My credit score was over 800 until the past year, and had fallen to 750 by the time of filing because of credit usage.
The business I owned was a retail store that at one time had been two stores. Expanding to a two store operation is what began a debt cycle that eventually grew like a cancer, devouring profits, cash dart, and sanity.
As a precursor to the national economic woes, this retail business had trended flat in volume for several years.
The volume during peak months in years past was always enough to terminate a negative cash flow and usually effect some excess cash into the company bank account. However, for the past couple of years, the peak months were no longer supporting the slower summer months.
But lines of credit did. I had become a mini version of General Motors, Chrysler, Ford and millions of other small businesses. Borrow some money now, pay it back later…… except that finally the economy was in the early stages of crashing.
Florida was struck by an abnormal hurricane season in 2004. Four hurricanes struck the state within a six week period during that volatile summer. Each time a storm ventured near or through, business slowed to a halt in anticipation of a devastating strike. Although physical damages to the retail operation were held to a minimum, significant sales volume was lost permanently.
Lines of credit took a hit from this.
Shortly after that summer storm season of 2004 had calmed, expenses began escalating. Liability insurance, fleet insurance, utilities, and fuel expenses all rose dramatically and almost immediately. Increases in both rent and with the rising cost of labor, turned the battle to survive the cash flow issues into a daily struggle instead of a seasonal one.
Still, I went on pursuing the American dream. Credit was readily available, my credit accumulate was rated as excellent, so I set up reserve lines of business credit, just in case they were ever needed. The only difference for me at this point is that now, during the slower summer months, I was no longer getting paid like everyone else was.
I would keep telling myself “that it’s going to get better, it always does“.
But it didn’t get better, it was getting worse and I knew it..
Realizing that I had stepped through this one way door, it was time to face reality. Sure, I could have extended this for a noteworthy time longer, but why?
It was like being tossed around in a clothes dryer.
Inaugurate the door……. jump in, get beat up, feel the heat…….. go round and round and round. Then it stops……so you put in some more money, and the endless cycle begins all over again.
Round and round and round.
The Plan
I had decided in November a year ago to give the business one last and final shot for the upcoming peak sales season. The business had to maintain a certain level through this time, or I would end the doors by the summer. In the meantime, I decided to no longer seek more financing, and that the extended lines of credit currently in hand were going to be the last.
It was during this time that I quietly began researching options in closing the business just in case my hope for success did not prevail.
Selling or transferring the business was out, as the debt load was too high and the assets not worth enough.
That left only one viable option; filing for bankruptcy.
I had a lifetime of perfect credit, was a self-made success, and was well respected by industry peers, employees and other associates.
How could this happen to me? I never cheated on taxes, wages, or payments to vendors. I never lied to anyone because I wanted to hurry the business without ever having to remember what I may have said, or have to look over my shoulder being wary of a bad deed I may have done.
I ran the business in a neat, honest, and straightforward manner. I took care of my employees, many of whom had been employed for 10 or more years. But the business was in a nosedive and it was taking me, the pilot, down with it. The time to bale out was now as eventually it was going to shatter.
A stand up guy always keeps his word to others, so now it was time to sustain my word to both my family and myself.
Now, the anxiety of the fear of failing along with all of the dreadful things that go with it, set in once I had finally established a personal ultimatum in bringing closure to this hell that had shrouded over me. It was a depressing winter to say the least as the national economy was beginning a free fall downward.
Failure
Acknowledging failure was the key component in deciding to terminate the business.
There is no description appropriate enough to describe the empty and lonely feeling one has inside when the words “I am closing it down” are spoken out loud to others who are being impacted by my decision. The labor employed at the store was largely unskilled, and many were dependent on the operational success to maintain their earning levels.
Wrestling with when and how to disclose this to those that matter was something that I carefully considered.
But how could I tell anyone? I was always the one that had the answers, solved the problems of others, and gave advice when it was asked. I was the stand up guy, a person that many people trusted. I was going to let all of them down I thought, including myself.
What will some of these people have to do when there is no longer a place for them to go to work? If I give them advance explore will they abandon the store early to take jobs somewhere else, leaving me crippled to the loss of labor, or, to those that conclude, leave me vulnerable to the temptation of uncontrollable theft? I unexcited had to manage the business to the end.
Or do I unbiased indicate up one morning and say “it’s been nice, but it’s a done deal and the store is closed”.
There was no one to advise me, no one to say that a certain path was the right one to take. I was all alone standing in my hold shadow, facing the failure of a business and now having to utter those fateful words to those alive to.
At least by this point, I tried to tell myself “it was the business that failed, and not me”, and would continue to force myself to remember that through the turbulent months ahead that were coming too soon and way too fast.
In the demolish I decided to do the right thing after all.
I knew that I would lose my own self respect if I did not give the employees as considerable advance notice as possible.
It should be their option as to how long they continued to work there, and not mine. The store was certainly going to face some premature exposure with the public by doing so, but that was the price that had to be paid. I did for them what I would have wanted to be done for me had I been in their shoes.
I was determined to leave the business with my self respect in hand and my boots still on.
I too was one of the casualties. But “I” was not the failure; “it was“.
Of that I was certain.
My hold perception of personal failure was placed on my shoulders solely by myself. Once the decision was made to cease operations, I finally realized that it was just the business that had failed.
Now I had an unenviable but recent challenge to face.
It’s just the beginning
After I had decided to close down, I retained an attorney about one month prior to closing the store. I had done much research during the winter months, and basically understood the process, it’s effect on me, and time frame that the bankruptcy was going to take. I also learned through research of potential pitfalls that lay ahead in case of objections posed by creditors.
Even though I was never completely clear of when I was closing until the date that I finally decided to do so, I had to plan ahead and make determined that I would not be in any kind of violation about the use of business credit.
In my case, I filed both a business bankruptcy and a personal chapter 7 bankruptcy. Filing a business bankruptcy wasn’t absolutely necessary since any creditors of the business would be coming after me personally anyway. But after consulting with the attorney, I felt the cleaner course of action would be to do both.
Filing both meant more money for the attorney but more peace of mind for me.
Preparation for filing included documenting the exact address and account number of everyone that I did business with. Even those vendors that were not creditors being owed money were listed on the final petition. It ended up being an enormous petition.
After several visits with the attorney’s paralegal, along with several corrections, the petition was finally in order to submit to the court.
In the meantime
As if the bankruptcy itself wasn’t stressful enough, I was still unemployed and receiving no income. Everyday was spent either job searching, furnishing more documents for the attorney, or both. The store closed in mid June, and by mid August I unruffled had neither a job nor an official filing date. My spouses’ wages were not enough to aid a family of four, while our savings account was continually shrinking .
The pressure of everything being incomplete was mounting.
It seemed as though mountains were on my shoulders and my knees wanted to buckle. I just wanted to move on with life but couldn’t. I was in limbo, or so it felt. Yet I knew that I had to stand tall, and now so more than ever.
This was my test. My alarm of failure was my personal enemy. And soon it was to be faced head on.
The Petition/341 meeting
By late August, everything finally seemed in order for the filing of the chapter 7 bankruptcy filing. The attorney’s office filed the petition electronically to the bankruptcy court, and within a day of receiving the petition, the court set a 341 meeting of the creditors about four weeks later. In my case, I had two separate 341 meetings; one for the business, and one for the personal filing.
All along, I had heard horror stories about the 341 meetings in front of the assigned trustee despite my attorney’s assurances that the meetings were generally routine.
I arrived early to the meeting for my personal chapter 7 filing and found myself alone in a separate room waiting for my representation and also for those others going before the trustee. I sat there anxious and very apprehensive of having to appear in front of the trustee with a room full of strangers.
What was shocking though was the diversity among those present. I felt especially taken in by the amount of elderly that were filing. I assumed their presence was largely due to unpaid medical bills.
Fortunately, for when the meeting started, I was to be the 5th out of 6 attendees. If the trustee was of the panic sage type then at least I would be prepared.
But once the first person went before the trustee, I immediately felt at ease.
Not because the trustee’s questions were exactly as my attorney had described, but I felt at ease because my new path was officially being set. The road to recovery and removing this big pressure was soon to be station in motion.
When my turn came, the trustee went through the routine questions and had one final question about a joint savings account held by both my wife and myself. He further asked me to provide to his office with savings account statements showing transactions from the previous six months.
No problem, or so I thought.
In Florida, a joint account is considered to be immune from the trustee’s claim, and the legal term is “tenancy by the entireties”. That’s as long as the spouse on the account is not filing nor has any legal connection to any of my debts.
In my case, my spouse was never keen with the business so she would not be affected by my bankruptcy.
The second day’s 341 meeting for the business chapter 7 was with a different trustee. Knowing what to expect this time, I was actually looking forward to going.
All creditors are invited to attend a 341 meeting at which time they may ask questions to the debtor or to object to a debtor’s filing. But rarely do they show up.
Except for mine.
But it turned out not to be a expansive deal as the creditor was the attorney of the former landlord of where the business had been located. Their appearance was regarding some assets left at the plaza. Nevertheless, it had been unexpected.
Waiting game
Once the 341 meetings are finished, the day calendar becomes very well-known. Generally within 60 days of the meeting and if there are no objections from any creditor, the trustee will discharge all debts listed on the petition.
Two weeks after my 341 meeting I received a letter from the trustee requesting more information regarding our joint bank accounts. This time he wanted complete statements showing all transactions of both savings and checking accounts that we held jointly.
One week later the trustee sent me a novel letter.
It was earth shattering when I opened it.
The trustee was filing an objection to my petition in general, citing the fact that we had moved our accounts from one bank to another after consulting an attorney, and because we had the protective clause of “tenancy by the entireties” inserted onto the signature card at the fresh bank.
He claimed I was fraudulent in my petition, and had attempted to hide assets from the court. A hearing in federal bankruptcy court was soon scheduled. I was horrified at the concept of this dragging on and on.
I was tranquil jobless and we were living off our savings account, but now the trustee wanted that too. I thought how unreasonable the trustee was, as we had moved the accounts on the advice of my attorney because we were trying to prevent a potential set off as my former bank had been one of my business creditors.
What was fraudulent about this? My attorney said they would try and get the instruct resolved as he didn’t assume the trustee had aptly reviewed all of the documentation regarding the accounts in question.
About two days before having to appear in federal bankruptcy court, the trustee finally relented after reviewing all of the documentation and promptly canceled the hearing. Thank goodness my attorney proved suitable.
Now the waiting game was nearly over even though the 341 meetings were held well past 60 days.
Since there were no other objections from the trustee or any creditors, I finally received gawk that my bankruptcy discharge was final. It took nearly 90 days from the date of my 341 hearings, but closure was finally in hand.
Advice
There is one thing that I wish I would have handled differently regarding my bankruptcy.
I should have made the decision to close the business and file much sooner than I did. In retrospect, once the business debt had reached a certain level, I should have began the process then. And In my case, at least one year earlier.
If you have the option and are prepared, do not delay. The pressure of mounting debt and either waiting or hoping for a solution can be nothing but torturous. I know this for a fact.
Remember the clothes dryer earlier…..round and round and round.
As far as handling the bankruptcy itself, there isn’t much that I could have done differently. Some roadblocks were encountered, but I stammer any bankruptcy with assets will have those.
The trustee is always going to try to commence the door to any assets they may believe the court is entitled to.
I would advise anyone in financial trouble to do worthy research and know what you are getting into. I was already aware of the process before I ever spoke to an attorney. I had made determined that I was not going to violate any time constraints on the use of lines of credit. This is important.
Be aware that all debts may not be dischargeable. Abuse of credit may be one of those.
Do not play games with hiding assets whether they be bank accounts, vehicles, or boats, and listen to your attorney.
Examine the details of your petition with a delicate tooth comb. Develop sure every creditor’s address and account number are lawful. I had found more than a handful of errors in my petitions, and kept finding them until a week before the 341 hearings.
If you do not understand fully what is going on, ask your attorney. Although the attorney has your best interests at heart, they are not you.
The future
For the first time in a long time, the future is now.
I no longer get calls from telephone solicitors nor an endless supply of credit card offers ( I started getting some recently however) through the mail.
I can go out and chat with a neighbor, fix dinner, and watch the news without worrying about a potential bankruptcy.
During the bankruptcy process, I gained employment after endlessly searching for over four months. I was blissful when I was offered a management position with a national corporation. There are level-headed some financial concerns, but there is now time to rebuild credit and establish new ties in the corporate world.
I no longer carry the weight of the world upon my shoulders, but most importantly, I am not afraid to tell anyone that I had filed bankruptcy. I realized that there was no shame in filing, and that the world serene does exists after doing so.
For that I am grateful.
Filed under Automotive Liability Insurance by on Feb 24th, 2011. Comment.
All modest organization owners, regardless of whether they own cafés or little newsstands, will need insurance of some sort or an additional In today’s world of fraudulent lawsuits and a general prevailing atmosphere of I’ll take whatever I can from whomever I can, this is a necessity
The very first step in your quest for insurance should really be to locate an insurance agent or broker Asking friends and acquaintances in your geographical area and field which agent they use is a excellent begin If this fails to turn up any dependable leads, ask the business that offers your personal insurance about additional coverage Most providers will supply lower rates since you already do company with them.Once you come across a broker or agent, make positive you inform him of the profile of your organization He can assist you develop a specialized profile for your enterprise requirements, and maybe end up packaging together numerous insurance policies for you, lowering your insurance costs.This being said, it is pretty crucial to shop around for your policies Each and every corporation has distinctive policies and costs, with diverse inclusions and exclusions Discovering 1 to suit your company can be a nightmare Most modest organization owners use some variation of a Company Owner’s Policy, a group of 3 sorts of protection, which is dependable, and helpful for virtually every single achievable kind of little company A breakdown of the 3 sorts is included below.Foremost is Property Insurance Property Insurance is for buildings that you conduct your enterprise in, an example being the workshop of a furniture-refinishing organization This can contain fire, break-in, theft, and any number of other elements, and can be customized with your insurance broker It is incredibly vital to note that various destructive occurrences are not commonly covered Flood damage is not covered, and must be looked into as a separate policy if your company is located in a flood plain Earthquakes are not covered either, as a general rule, though some coverage may perhaps be bought as an additional addition, if requested Lastly, due to the Terrorism Risk Insurance Act, only companies that buy optional terrorism coverage are covered from losses originating from a terrorist attack.Secondly, we have Enterprise Interruption Insurance, which covers costs associated with a disruption of the running of your enterprise, such as a fire in your primary organization place Such a policy might or could possibly not cover the costs of operating at a temporary location Once more, you need to check with your insurance broker.Lastly, but maybe most importantly in our society, is Liability Insurance This covers the legal responsibility for harm that your business might trigger to their clients or the general public This harm is a result of actions or inactions of you or your employees do in your enterprise operations that trigger bodily injury or property damage from use of your products and/or services.It is vital to note that Enterprise Owner’s Policies (BOPs) do NOT cover professional liability, automobile insurance, Workers Compensation or well being and disability insurance You’ll need separate insurance policies for coverage of employees, vehicles, and other assorted services.For experts, extra coverage is needed in the case of a product they have produced not meeting the requirements of their specific trade For example, a mason who builds a wall, only to have it collapse within the year due to poor building would need extra coverage Experts are expected to have training, both practical and academic, in their field, and be able to perform their jobs according to the standards of their business Failure to perform in such a fashion can result in being held responsible for and damages to persons or property in a court of law This can be looked after by obtaining a specialty insurance, known as Professional Insurance Such a policy is a great concept for automotive repair shops, masons, welders, electricians, plumbers, and most extremely specialized trades Ask your broker if Professional Insurance is a great investment for you This is under the heading of specialty insurance, and rather few, if any BOPs contain it If a lot of of your buyers deal with you by means of a single employee, Key Employee Life Insurance might possibly be for you This is created to insure losses that a caused by the death of a key employee, such as your manager When suppliers, buyers, and the upper management all converge to get info from 1 individual, you would look at this individual a key employee If this individual had been to turn out to be disabled or to die, Key Employee Life Insurance compensates the organization against substantial losses that would result Once more, this is specialty coverage, so ask your broker about it.In the end, there are far too a large number of sorts of enterprise insurance to list in a short article Most kinds only cover modest pieces of your company, and as such, the expertise of a licensed insurance agent is completely important to making positive all your requirements and vulnerabilities are dealt with in an efficient and cost-efficient manner .
Filed under Automotive Liability Insurance by on Dec 20th, 2010. Comment.
The facts of this case pertain to the liability imposed to a manufacturer of a depraved product. Common law imposes liability to the manufacturers of the scandalous product under the principle of strict liability. Black’s Law Dictionary defines strict liability as liability without fault. A case is one of strict liability “when neither care nor negligence, neither good nor terrible faith, neither knowledge nor ignorance will save defendant (Black’s Law Dictionary, 1968 Ed., p. 1968) There is strict liability when one is made liable for something independent of fault, negligence, or intent after establishing certain facts specified by law. Strict liability can be committed even if reasonable care was exercised and regardless of the state of mind of the actor at that time.
Under the US Law, the traditional bastion of strictly liability includes liability for injuries caused by animals, ultra-hazardous activities and nuisance. For example, the law imposes liability to the possessor or any person who makes use of the animal independent of the presence of fault of negligence. Our law also imposes obligation to the owners of business enterprises and their employers to pay for the death or injuries to their employees even if the event may have been purely accidental or entirely due to a fortuitous cause. Another example of strict liability is the case of a manufacturer of a vehicle failing to meet the expectations of its customer.
2. Facts: Alex Hard was driving his car when he was keen in an accident. The impact was so strong that he was thrown from the vehicle. As a result of the accident Alex Hardy suffered serious and permanent injuries and he became paralyzed from the waist down. Hence, a suit was filed by Alex Hardy against the manufacturers of the car for breach of contract arguing that the car did not conform with the expectations and the defects were hidden. During the trial, the manufacturers argued that Hardy was drunk, not wearing a seatbelt and had fallen asleep at the time of the accident. For his allotment, Hardy admitted that he has drunk at the time of the accident. He also admitted that he was not wearing a seatbelt at the time of the accident. Investigation also revealed that he fell asleep while driving. However, he argued that none of these was the proximate cause for his being paralyzed. He thus argued that because of the defects in his car, the axle of his truck broke, his vehicle rolled over and his door latch failed. It is because of the putrid manufacture of his car that caused his accident.
Issue: whether manufacturers of the car should be sued for breach of contract and be held liable for the defects in the car despite the presence of negligence of the complainant
Held: The court ruled in favor of the complainant. The Jury awarded Hardy $50 M in compensatory damages and an additional $100 M in punitive damages.
3. I believe the ruling for this case will still be in favor of Hardy but the damages awarded in his favor should be mitigated in notion of the contributory negligence of Hardy. Well-settled is the rule that the manufactures of a defective product is liable for any death or injury resulting to the consumers even if no contractual relations exist between them. The liability is imposed to manufacturers regardless of the presence of negligence on their part.
There are several reasons why common law imposes strict liability upon manufacturers of defective products. One reason for this is that it will not be possible for the consumers to prove the negligence against the manufacturers. The process that the products of the manufacturers undergo is not within the knowledge of the consumer. It will therefore not be possible to require as a precondition for suits to prove that the produce of a defective car is negligent.
Another reason is that imposing strict liability against the manufacturers provides an effective and necessary incentive to manufacturers to manufacture their products as safe as possible. It must be stressed that unless serious responsibility is imposed against the manufacturers they will continue to neglect providing for an appropriate standard of safety to all their products. The theory here is that by placing responsibility to the manufacturer, it is forced to take into account when deciding whether and how much to product the product the harm caused by it. (“Product Liability”) Business considerations demand that because of the risks attendant to the develop of car, the manufacturer may either end the business or sell its products at a higher ticket.
As between the manufacturer and the consumer, it is the manufacturer which is in the better position to protect the consumers against harm and injury caused by defects in the product either by insuring against liability or adding the cost of the insurance to the price of the product. One safety net which General Motors may avail of in case of death or injury to its consumers is by insuring against the liability and passing the cost of the insurance to the consumers. If in case the manufactures fail to avail of this remedy then they should be held accountable for any injury.
Strict liability may be accomplished by a series of actions, in which the consumer first recovers from the retailer on warranty, and liability on warranties is then carried back through the intermediate dealers to the manufacturer. The process is time-consuming, expensive, and wasteful. In this case, Hardy may sue the retailer and the retailer may eventually file another complaint against the manufacturers. Instead of being involved in multiplicity of suits, Hardy may directly file suit against General Motors.
Strict liability is also imposed against the manufacturers because by placing the product on the market, the seller represents to the market public that it is fit and he intends and expects that it will be purchased and consumed in reliance upon that representation. In the case of Alex Hardy, when he purchased his Chevrolet S-10 Blazer he relied upon the representation that the car is fit. He expected that the car will have the safety mechanisms that will prevent him from suffering serious injuries in cases of accidents. The design therefore has the accurate and ethical responsibility to ensure that cars it execute complies with this expectation of the public.
Another reason is that the cost of the accidents should be placed on the party best able to determine whether there are means to prevent the accident. When those means are less expensive than the costs of such accidents, responsibility for implementing them should be placed on the party best able to do so. Manufacturers have the means and the technical know how to install in its products safety mechanisms designed to prevent injuries. Only the manufacturers can make their products better and more secured so as to avoid any injury. In this case, General Motors, despite its means and technical know how failed to install mechanisms that will ensure that the drivers of their cars are safe.
In the case of O’Brien vs. Muskin Corp. 94 N.J. 169, 463 A.2d 298 (New Jersey, 1983), it applied the consumer expectation test in determining whether manufacturers of defective products should be held liable. It ruled that a product may be found defective in design if the plaintiff demonstrates that the product failed to perform as safely as an ordinary consumer would expect when used in an intended or reasonably foreseeable manner. Under this test, when there I no evidence, direct or circumstantial, available what sort of manufacturing flaw existed, or exactly how the design was deficient, the plaintiff may nonetheless be able to establish his right to recover by proving that the product did not form in keeping with the reasonable expectation of the use.
Though the manufacturer should be held liable for the defects in its products, it is not the sole factor to be blamed for the accident. To impose against the manufacturers sole responsibility for the accident would be a serious violation of due process. Justice and equity demands that the liability of General Motors be equitable reduced because of the contributory negligence of Alex Hardy at the time of the accident. It must be stressed at Alex Hardy admitted that at the time of the accident he was drunk, not wearing a seatbelt and had fallen asleep at the time of the accident. The negligence of Alex Hardy therefore contributed to the injuries he suffered. If he only had not fallen asleep or he had worn his seatbelt or he had not drunk alcohol, the accident would not have happened and he would not have suffered the injury.
Thus, Alex Hardy was entitled to compensatory damages and punitive damages as a result of the defects in the manufacture of the car. But he is not entitled to recover the full amount awarded by the lower court to him in view of his negligence.
4. If this case was filed in my court, I deem the ruling will still be the same. Laws are imposed as a means to ensure that justice be served. It serves as an instrument for the perpetuation of justice and equity. It should not be utilized as a source of abuse. To hold General Motors entirely accountable for the injuries Hardy suffered will mean using the courts as an instrument for abuse. I believe the damages should be awarded because of the defects of the vehicle manufactured by General Motors under the “consumers’ expectation test.” It should however be equitably mitigated in view of the contributory negligence of Alex Hardy.
Filed under Automotive Liability Insurance by on Dec 18th, 2010. Comment.
If you are looking to buy a car, one element to consider beyond the purchase price is how much your insurance premiums will be over the life of your vehicle. These cars are some of the cheapest types of cars to insure, although it will of course vary depending on your dependable situation.
Cheapest Cars to Insure: Sedans
Sedans are considerable smaller than trucks and SUVs, so they will cause less damage to other vehicles in an average accident. Therefore, your liability insurance premiums will be less than with larger vehicles. In addition, sedans are less expensive to repair than SUVs and trucks, so the collision and comprehensive coverage will typically be less as well. Lastly, the purchase price of a sedan is lower than an SUV, so it will cost the insurance company less to replace it if it is totaled.
Cheapest Cars to Insure: Older Vehicles
In addition, if your vehicle is older, it will probably be cheaper to insure because its replacement cost would be less than a new vehicle. If it is so old that the replacement cost isn’t worth paying for collision and comprehensive coverage, then it will be even cheaper to insure, although you will run the risk of having to pay for all repairs if you get in an accident.
Cheapest Cars to Insure: Safety Equipped
If your car is equipped with safety features such as airbags and anti-lock brakes, it is likely that it will be cheaper to insure. This is because you will be more protected in case of an accident and will have lower costs for medical bills for the insurance company to pay.
Cheapest Cars to Insure: Scare Systems
Lastly, cars equipped with anti-theft systems such as car alarms and tracking devices will also be less expensive to insure, at least for comprehensive coverage. Because comprehensive coverage pays for your car in case of theft, insurance companies will give you a discount if your car is equipped with theft deterrents. It is much harder to steal and easier to recover a car with an alarm system or a tracking intention!
Filed under Automotive Liability Insurance by on Dec 18th, 2010. Comment.
Dear President B.H Obama:
Allow me initial congratulate you on behalf of all previous modest city Mayors (Round Hill, VA, 1996-2000) on currently being elected to the most powerful workplace in the globe with the most miniscule set of credentials since Senator Warren Gamaliel Harding in 1920 But then again, that would be a disservice to Senator Harding as he at least served a complete Senate term (getting the initially sitting Senator elected President) and had practical experience in the company globe exactly where he, with the help and collaboration of his wife Florence, turned the Marion Every day Star into a prosperous, revenue-generating, job-creating enterprise And all of this was achieved in a competitive market, without having any form of administration bailout or subsidy whatsoever Who knew this kind of important things could be carried out But I digress Further, I believe I also speak on behalf of all previous Mayors when I say that I fervently hope that your time in workplace turns out much better than poor Warren’s.As a previous elected official with infinitely greater executive encounter than you presently posses, allow me provide some recommendation that I’ve accumulated.one Taxes – Every person Is In This TogetherTaxes are high (at least for families who really spend them!) – considerably higher and on a far significantly more intrusive level than ever prior to A great deal worse, even, than at the time of our separation from England see Jefferson, Thomas; Declaration of Independence Either all of us will need to spend anything or no one have to spend anything Provided your tax strategy appears to be to free of charge as a great deal of many people as achievable from having any federal tax liability whatsoever, I would suggest you go all out and suggest that the 16th Amendment be repealed and that some other sort of tax, this kind of as a consumption tax, be implemented in its place Provided your previous comments that you want to make certain that our tax system is honest , I would direct you to Representative John Linder’s proposed Honest Tax Act (HR-25).2 Lead By InstanceCongress has put pressure on the automotive executives to forgo bonuses and to function, essentially, for cost-free This is a fantastic option for you to lead by instance by showing that in these exhausting times that the federal administration, as well, can tighten its belt As this kind of, if I were President, I would instantly decree that, like the automotive executives, I would function for a salary of $one/yr as would the Vice President, Cabinet Secretaries, and all heads of the other executive agencies I would send legislation to Congress decreeing that Representatives and Senators would also receive no extra than $one/yr.three There Are LimitationsEvery City in Virginia is granted a Charter by the Virginia legislature This Charter enumerates (i.e., explicitly lists) the elements the City Authorities is authorized to do The Federal Governing administration has a comparable construct – the US Constitution But rather than currently being granted by some legislative authority, the authority comes from We, the Folks Nowhere in this document does it say that the federal govt would be wise to offer insurance coverage, health care procedures, or low-interest loans to its citizens or companies Nor does it say that Congress has the authority to mandate that private institutions do these factors at their personal risk or on their very own dime Sadly, this is exactly where we are now And this is only the tip of the proverbial iceberg So, my recommendation, stick to what you are suppose to be undertaking and allow the States do the rest see Hamilton, et al., The Federalist Papers.4 Anyone Should really Be Mad About Anything – But No person Need to Be Mad About Every thingAt every single City Council meeting I presided over there was an prospect – some said as well significantly chance – for citizens to address the Council If we went a whole lot more than two or 3 meetings devoid of somebody obtaining up and ripping us a new 1, I became concerned that I wasn’t performing my job There’s no way that an elected politician – even 1 elected in non-partisan elections – can make all of us happy There are as well countless constituencies with as well a large amount of conflicting goals and objectives to make this attainable So, my suggestions to you, listen to your critics considerably more than you listen to your supporters Ask your self which of these – critics or supporters – have the finest interest of the nation in mind and which group is advocating policies that promote the founding American ideals of freedom, liberty, independence, and self-sufficiency When in doubt, side with these ideals.5 Be Decisive, Be ConsistentThere is no voting present when you are the President There are especially few concerns that are over your spend grade If there are challenges that are outside your authority, see #three, over If this is the case, say so and allow it stand at that Speak out when assistance or condemnation on behalf of the people today of the United States is warranted Carve out a coverage and stick with it If you require to alter coverage, the factors really should be clearly enumerated Make decisions And, please, locate a role model for this characteristic other than John Kerry 6 Take Responsibility for Your ActionsWhen you screw up, admit it When a coverage doesn’t have the meant end result, transform it When a program does not have the meant end result, cancel it No one likes a finger pointer – specially when the finger is pointed at the American people today No one likes wasting their exhausting-earned funds Even less buyers like having an individual else waste their tough-earned funds If another person acting on your behalf actions out of bounds, send them packing You’ve promised transparency, let’s hope it occurs.This nation has prospered as it has since of the unlimited possibility it has afforded and the constraint, for the most component, of the administration (federal, state, and local) from infringing on the individual rights, liberties, and freedoms of its citizens I pray that your administration, even so lengthy it may possibly be, will continue to uphold this tradition.Stephen Kuehm, Mayor, City of Round Hill, VA, 1996-2000 .
Filed under Automotive Liability Insurance by on Nov 10th, 2010. Comment.



